Melanie Dolechek
Melanie Dolechek is the executive director of the Society for Scholarly Publishing and a member of ASAE’s Small Staff Advisory Group.
Part 1: Laying the groundwork—what nondues revenue is, why it matters, and how to evaluate and plan for it responsibly.
Nondues revenue is essential for associations seeking financial resilience and deeper member engagement. What once served as a supplemental funding stream is now a core component of financial sustainability, particularly as membership models evolve and external pressures including economic uncertainty and shifting professional expectations reshape how organizations deliver value.
Generating nondues revenue is not simply a matter of launching new products or services. The most successful initiatives emerge from a disciplined, strategic approach—one that aligns with mission, responds to clearly defined member needs, and is supported by realistic operational planning.
The following framework, drawn from conversations among association leaders during a recent ASAE Small Staff Associations “Let’s Chat” session, offers a practical road map for evaluating, launching, and sustaining nondues revenue initiatives that align with organizational mission and your members’ needs.
Nondues revenue encompasses all income streams beyond membership dues, including education programs, events, sponsorships, publications, and other specialized offerings such as benchmarking data or consulting services. While the financial contribution of these streams is often the most visible benefit, their broader strategic value lies in how they deepen member engagement and extend the association’s relevance.
When thoughtfully designed, nondues offerings become vehicles for delivering member value in different formats and at different stages of a professional journey. They allow associations to meet members where they are through skill-building, networking, or access to insights, and to engage nonmembers who may later convert into full participants in the community. Well-designed programs create additional touchpoints with members, deepen engagement, and demonstrate the tangible return on membership investment.
Associations operate within a diverse ecosystem of potential revenue streams. Foundational categories including events and meetings, certification and accreditation programs, and educational offerings continue to anchor many portfolios, while sponsorships, advertising, and tradeshows provide opportunities to connect industry partners with engaged audiences. Affinity programs provide added value for members while generating nondues revenue for the association.
Benchmarking or salary-data products can be leveraged to respond to increased demand for evidence-based decision making. Professional services such as consulting or coaching allow associations to leverage internal expertise in more tailored ways. Digital opportunities, including content licensing and digital retargeting services offer new potential for monetization.
At my own organization, the Society for Scholarly Publishing, an active job board and our relatively new (and competitive) EPIC Awards program, which recognizes and celebrates the exceptional work shaping scholarly communications, are examples of nondues revenue programs that also create member value and engagement.
Not every type of nondues revenue program will be right for your association. Associations that attempt to pursue too many revenue streams simultaneously often dilute focus and strain limited capacity. A more effective approach is to identify a small number of opportunities that align strongly with mission and audience needs, and then invest in executing them well.
Every new revenue initiative begins with an idea—and early-stage evaluation that includes a set of disciplined questions helps to home in on the most promising ones to move forward with.
Mission alignment serves as the first filter. Does the proposed program advance the organization’s purpose, or does it risk diverting attention and resources? This is not only a philosophical consideration but a practical one; initiatives that lack alignment are harder to sustain internally and more difficult to communicate externally.
Programs that exist primarily to generate revenue without a compelling member-facing rationale often struggle to find traction. Associations must assess whether the offering addresses a clearly articulated need or solves a meaningful problem. This often requires moving beyond assumptions and engaging directly with members through surveys, focus groups, or informal conversations.
Understanding what competitors, vendors, or peer organizations already provide helps define both opportunity and boundaries. In some cases, the opportunity may lie within differentiation rather than invention.
These considerations support an initial “go/no-go” assessment, allowing leadership to prioritize ideas that merit further investment.
Even well-conceived initiatives can stall without clear ownership and governance. Bringing together the right stakeholders (staff, volunteer leaders, board members, and subject-matter experts) creates the diverse perspective needed to evaluate both opportunity and risk.
Defining roles early helps prevent ambiguity later. A RACI framework, which identifies who is responsible, accountable, consulted, and informed, can bring clarity to both decision making and execution.
In small-staff environments particularly, it is critical to ensure that an internal champion exists; someone with both the authority and the enthusiasm to shepherd the program through its early stages.
Once an idea passes initial evaluation, the focus shifts to feasibility. This stage requires a realistic appraisal of what it will take to bring the program to life and sustain it over time.
What is the realistic lifespan of this program? Is it a one-time revenue event or an ongoing initiative? Clarifying this upfront informs investment decisions and success metrics.
Scalability is another key factor. Can the program grow beyond an initial audience? Are the necessary technology platforms in place? Does the organization have, or can it develop, the staffing capacity required to support expansion?
Resource assessment must be comprehensive. Staff time and expertise are often the most constrained assets, particularly in small-staff associations. Volunteer engagement can extend capacity but should not be relied upon as a substitute for core operational functions. Financial considerations include both startup costs such as platform development or marketing and ongoing expenses. Sustainability ultimately depends on aligning these inputs with realistic expectations for revenue and impact.
With a solid foundation in place, including a mission-aligned idea, clear ownership, and a well-constructed business plan, your association is positioned to move from concept to action. In Part 2, we’ll explore how to measure success, avoid common pitfalls, and make the difficult but necessary decisions that keep your nondues revenue portfolio healthy over time.