Chris Vaughan, Ph.D.
Chris Vaughan, Ph.D., is cofounder and chief strategy officer of Sequence Consulting.
The biggest barrier to joining an association may not be what you think.
When membership growth stalls, associations tend to interrogate the offer. The value proposition gets another round of focus groups. Dues get benchmarked against peers. Someone suggests the onboarding sequence needs a refresh. It is well-intentioned work, and much of it is worth doing. But it rests on an assumption that rarely gets tested: that the people who didn’t join looked at the offer and passed.
Many of them never looked.
Higher Logic’s “2025 Association Member Experience Report” found that 46 percent of nonmembers aren’t aware of an association relevant to them. Cost, the barrier associations worry about most, came in at 33 percent. The most common reason people stay out has nothing to do with price or value. They don’t know the association exists.
That finding should change where associations look first.
Visibility has always been the least glamorous part of membership growth, and the easiest to neglect, because its failures don’t show up anywhere. A membership director can show the board how many people opened the renewal email, registered for the webinar, or abandoned the join form halfway through. No report shows the early-career professional who spent an evening researching her field and never came across the association built for her. The people who never arrived aren’t in anyone’s data.
People find associations in many ways: through an employer, a professor, a colleague, a search. That last path is changing fastest. The same professional who once would have clicked through a page of results now often gets a finished answer at the top of the page, assembled by AI from sources she may never visit. Pew Research Center found that clicks to any website roughly halve when one of those summaries appears, and Ahrefs found top-ranked pages lost 58 percent of their clicks when comparing data from December 2025 to December 2023 (before AI summaries in search results).
AI didn’t create the visibility problem. It just exposes it faster. And the fix that works there is the same one that works everywhere else.
Marketing teams have spent a decade building search presence, and they’re good at it. What limits them is rarely technique. It’s the material they have to work with.
Many association homepages carry some version of the same sentence: The association advances the profession, fosters community, and drives innovation. Every word of it is true, and none of it helps. It doesn’t give a colleague a reason to recommend the association, an employer a reason to point a new hire toward it, or an AI tool a reason to name it. No association can opt out of the AI summary, but it can get named in it. These tools build their answers from sources that speak directly to the question being asked, and a line about advancing the profession speaks to no one's question in particular. What wins is something more specific: a clear outcome for a clear audience.
Consider two ways a specialty nursing association might describe itself. One says it advances nursing practice through education, research, and community. The other says it helps nurses in its specialty earn the certification hospitals reward and prepares them to move from the bedside into charge and unit leadership roles. The first describes activities. The second describes results, for people who can recognize themselves in it. That is the version a colleague repeats, an employer forwards, and an AI assistant surfaces.
The associations most exposed in this new era are the ones that have never pinned down which outcomes they deliver, and for whom.
The temptation will be to treat this as a technical problem: Hire an agency or launch an AI search initiative. That misreads it. An association that can name the outcomes it delivers for specific audiences tends to show up well wherever people look, for the same reason it does well across the table from a prospective member.
Marketing can sharpen that message. But the hard choices underneath it, which audiences come first and which outcomes the association will stand behind, need the executive team’s commitment. Without that, marketing is left describing an association that hasn’t decided what it is.
Two steps make this concrete. First, ask the leadership team to write one paragraph naming the outcomes the association delivers, for which audiences, better than the alternatives. Then set that paragraph next to the homepage and the membership marketing copy. In many associations, the paragraph, the homepage, and the marketing copy describe three slightly different organizations. Each is accurate. None is specific enough to repeat. Second, once there is one answer, carry it everywhere the association shows up: the website, recruitment campaigns, social media, and the way staff and volunteer leaders explain why someone should join.
Here’s the good news in the Higher Logic finding: The people an association hasn’t reached often haven’t turned it down. They haven’t weighed the dues and walked away. Many have simply never been asked. The associations that can say plainly what they deliver, and for whom, are the ones people will find. And the ones they’ll say yes to.