LeAnn Ely
LeAnn Ely is director of operations & technology at Diversified Management Services.
Association leaders can build stronger, more resilient teams by recognizing that meaningful career growth looks different at every stage.
There’s a question that came up in a recent leadership meeting that stopped everyone in their tracks.
We were deep in the weeds talking through the technical side of restructuring our staff tier system when someone paused and asked, “Do you remember what you wanted from a staff development process like this at the beginning of your career versus at the five, 10, 15, or 20 mark?”
The room shifted. Suddenly we weren’t talking about org charts and compensation bands. We were talking about people—about ambition, pace, identity, and what it actually means to feel valued at work over the long haul.
It was a great reminder that the best career development systems aren’t just logistical frameworks. They’re reflections of how well an organization understands the human experience of working within it.
It’s time we acknowledge the reality of career phases. Anyone who has spent real time in a career, especially in the small business or nonprofit world, knows that professional growth doesn’t follow a straight line. There are seasons of rapid acceleration, seasons of intentional steadiness, and seasons of deep refinement where you’re not climbing so much as you’re mastering. The challenge is that most career development systems are built for the climbers. They reward upward movement, and only upward movement. And when someone is in a maintenance or refining phase, which is often when they’re doing their most valuable work, the system goes quiet. There’s no language for what they’re doing. No recognition. No path that feels like it belongs to them. For organizations like ours, that gap matters enormously.
For those of us working in association management, the industry gives us something genuinely unique: variety.
Because we serve multiple clients across different industries, our team is constantly exposed to a rich mix of projects, challenges, and strategic problems. That natural rotation means there are real, substantive opportunities to grow, not just busy work dressed up as development.
But we’re also a smaller organization. And smaller organizations don’t have the luxury of 32 job levels or a sprawling internal mobility marketplace. When you’re not a large enterprise, you have to be more intentional, more creative, and frankly, more honest, about what career growth actually looks like here.
We had a choice—keep retrofitting a system that was never designed for us, or build something that was. We chose to build.
Our goal was ambitious: Create a system that honors different paces of growth, remains genuinely useful in a busy workday, and doesn’t require a PhD to navigate. Here’s the thinking behind what we landed on.
What we’re really designing for with career growth opportunities is legitimacy—the feeling that wherever you are in your career, your path is real, your contributions matter, and your organization has actually thought about you. That’s harder than building a tier chart. It requires asking better questions, listening to the answers, and being willing to challenge the assumption that more levels equal more meaning.
How is your organization thinking about career development? We’d love to compare notes.